skip to main content

Biography

Brian Kappel is a versatile litigator who learned from some of the best.

Brian P. Kappel is a versatile litigator who cut his teeth alongside Lightfoot’s top trial attorneys, and he applies that experience to complex, high‑stakes disputes. Clients value his individualized attention, creative problem‑solving, and efficient, business‑minded strategies. His practice centers on environmental litigation and commercial disputes, with additional depth in class actions, antitrust, employment matters, and collegiate sports/NCAA issues. 

Brian represents companies in significant environmental matters across the Southeast, including groundwater and PFAS/PFOA contamination disputes and related regulatory and public‑facing challenges. His recent work includes author contributions and editorial review for Chambers’ Environmental Law 2025 Alabama guidance, reflecting his on‑the‑ground perspective for corporate clients navigating evolving environmental frameworks. He has also been recognized in Environmental Litigation by Mid‑South Super Lawyers (2023). 

Drawing on his background as an Academic All‑American baseball player at Princeton and a Minor League relief pitcher, Brian counsels institutions, coaches, administrators, and student‑athletes through NCAA compliance investigations and infractions cases, including matters before the NCAA Committees on Infractions and related bodies. He routinely advises on bylaw interpretation, self‑reporting, and penalty scope and implementation, and he has helped restore eligibility for several high‑profile student‑athletes. Brian also provides advice regarding coaching and administrator contracts, NIL strategy, and compliance with federal education rules and regulations, including Title IX, FERPA, and the ADA.  

Representative Matters

Representing a prominent automobile manufacturer facing allegations involving the alleged sale of trucks with a defect resulting in excessive oil consumption and subsequent engine damage. Successfully navigated the complexities of a cross-jurisdictional class action and secured a motion for summary judgment, with the judge conclusively ruling in favor of our client, dismissing all allegations.

Obtaining the dismissal of a lawsuit against a national provider of railroad services in a case involving claims of negligence in connection with a rail car inspection.

Obtaining summary judgment in favor of an Alabama-based division of a national business in a lawsuit brought by a former employee who claimed he was terminated in retaliation for exercising his rights under the FMLA.

Obtaining summary judgment for an employer in a case filed by a then-current employee alleging discrimination in promotion decisions under the ADA.

Obtaining mandamus relief from the Alabama Supreme Court for a Michigan-based manufacturer whose motion to dismiss based on the trial court’s lack of personal jurisdiction was wrongly denied.

Representing an NCAA member institution (Division I) throughout the investigation/enforcement process in responding to a notice of allegations and also before the Division I Committee on Infractions and Division I Infractions Appeals Committee.

Representing NCAA member institutions (Division I) in connection with internal investigations and prepared secondary violation reports.

Representing NCAA member institutions (Division II and III) in connection with internal investigations and prepared summary disposition reports for the respective Committees on Infractions.

Representing an NCAA coach (Division I) in responding to a notice of allegations and before the Division I Committee on Infractions.

Representing NCAA athletics administrators (Division I) in connection with ongoing NCAA investigations and before the Division I Committee on Infractions.

Representing multiple NCAA student-athletes (Division I) in seeking waivers of NCAA legislation.

Articles

Events

News

Presentations and Publications

Presenter, “Outside Counsel for NCAA Compliance: A Practitioner’s Perspective,” (May 3, 2018)

^ Back to Top